December 14, 2008

A controversial call in a big game goes Pittsburgh's way? Shocking!!!

I'll update this as needed, but there's no way that there was indisputable visual evidence to overturn the call on the field: Down inside the 1-yard line, no touchdown.

Welcome to our world, Ravens fans.


brett hancock said...

I love that the official essentially botches his own review. "The receiver had both feet down with position". He fails to mention how he felt about the ball not crossing the goal line?

Alan said...

The official never stated anything about the ball crossing the plain in his explanation. Two feet in the endzone doesn't make it a touchdown. Baltimore got robbed.

Hudson Hawk said...

I totally agree. It didn't look like a touchdown to me but that is irrelevant. There is no possible way that there was conclusive evidence to overturn the ruling.